Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

California Legal

  •  
  •  

Foreclosure For Sale Bank Owned REUTERS Rick Wilking

California sues law firms promising mortgage relief

8/18/2011 COMMENTS (1)

NEW YORK, Aug 18 (Reuters) - California has broken up what it called a ring of law firms that preyed on struggling homeowners nationwide to pay thousands of dollars each to file mass lawsuits against their mortgage lenders.

Kamala Harris, the state's attorney general, on Thursday said she sued three law firms, four lawyers and 14 other companies and individuals who conspired to fleece struggling borrowers desperate to obtain mortgage relief.

She said these defendants took advantage of borrowers' frustration with lenders and servicers, in a housing crisis now in its fifth year and which hit California particularly hard.

"With the industry's growing reputation for fraud and the legislative ban on advance fees for loan modification services, defendants saw a more profitable opportunity to sell lawsuits rather than loan modifications," the state said in its complaint filed in the Los Angeles County superior court.

According to officials, the defendants solicited homeowners in 17 U.S. states with at least 2 million pieces of mail, and extracted retainer fees of up to $10,000 from each of roughly 2,500 borrowers to participate in "mass joinder" lawsuits.

Harris said these defendants would deceive borrowers into believing their participation would help them avoid foreclosures, reduce their loan balances or interest rates, or even receive clear title to their homes.

Instead, she said borrowers were often provided bad legal advice or unable to get answers to simple questions, including whether they were in fact added to lawsuits. A disproportionate number were black or Hispanic, officials said.

Victims were led to believe that the lawsuits "would be the way that they could receive justice," Harris said at a news conference monitored via webcast. "The only people who paid were those homeowners."

California said its state bar seized the law practices and attorney accounts of the three law firms, which are all based in the state, and the four lawyers.

They are the Calabasas-based firm Kramer & Kaslow and its principal Philip Kramer, who officials called the leader of the scheme; Costa Mesa-based Mesa Law Group Corp and its principal Paul Petersen; Walnut Creek- and Agoura Hills-based Mitchell J Stein & Associates and its principal Mitchell Stein; and the Encino-based lawyer Christopher Van Son.

The lawsuit alleges violations of several laws, and seek a halt to the illegal practices, as well as fines and other remedies. Kramer's firm was put into receivership on Monday.

A call to the Kramer firm was answered by a recorded message. The Mesa law firm and Van Son did not respond to requests for comment. Stein's office referred a call to the office of U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein. A spokesman there had no immediate comment.

The case is California v. The Law Offices of Kramer and Kaslow et al, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, No. LC 094571.

For the state: AG Kamala Harris, Deputy AG James Toma, Senior Assistant AG Frances Grunder and Supervising Deputy AG Benjamin Diehl.

For the defendants: Not immediately available.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Additional reporting by Jeff Roberts)

Follow us on Twitter: @ReutersLegal


Comments (1)

8/21/2011 7:24:55 PM by DeborahLamb

This is so mislerading as if the government cares about the struggling home owner. Nothing would be done if this were the case. The Dept of Justice trumped up charges on these attorneys because they were ethically representing the average home owner. Thew banks are taking advantage of the struggling home owner, the government only helps the banks. The banks love to foreclose on homeowners because they get more money. The banks own the government. This article is so misleading, these attorneys were trying to seek justice for home owners in a non-just government where corruption rules.


Register or log in to comment.

© 2012 Thomson Reuters