Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

California Legal

  •  
  •  

California mom says baby died because docs purposely delayed delivery

1/7/2011 COMMENTS (5)

Jan 7 (Westlaw Journals) - Doctors at a California hospital purposely delayed a baby’s delivery to “increase the probability” that the baby would die after they realized he would be born with significant neurologic brain injuries, according to a lawsuit filed by the baby’s mother.

Aliscia Towles alleges doctors at Centinela Hospital Medical Center knew as early as 10:47 p.m. on July 22, 2010, that her son required immediate delivery and that failure to deliver him within 30 minutes would result in his being born brain damaged.

Despite this knowledge, obstetrician Shereen Lukathy Beverly and anesthesiologist Steven Reid Giles “undertook actions designed to kill [the] baby” so as to “save the defendants the legal responsibility for her son’s future care and loss of earnings,” according to the suit filed against the hospital and physicians in Los Angeles County Superior Court.   

Towles arrived at the hospital July 22, 2010, around 3 p.m. in active labor.  Fetal monitoring was started, which showed a normal, healthy, reactive fetus, the suit says.

Beverly performed an artificial rupture of membranes around 7:10 p.m.  Fetal monitoring continued to show a healthy, reactive fetus.

Beverly ordered administration of Pitocin to accelerate labor and left the hospital with instructions to call her when Towles was “ready to deliver.”

About an hour later, the fetal monitor showed a change in the baby’s heart rate indicating distress, the complaint says.  The labor nurse informed Beverly of the heart rate change.

A second call was made to Beverly at 9:29 p.m. when the baby’s heart signaled further distress and the doctor arrived about 15 minutes later.

Three attempts from 10:29 until almost 10:45 p.m. deliver the baby vaginally failed.

Beverly ordered a Cesarean section for the plaintiff and the anesthesiologist, Giles, was called at 10:47 p.m.  Fetal monitoring showed the baby’s heart rate was extremely low and “would soon die if not delivered promptly,” the suit contends.

The complaint says that when Giles finally arrived at 11:20 p.m.  he and Beverly “decided to purposely delay the delivery of the baby” to increase the probability of the baby dying before delivery.

The baby was delivered at 11:50 p.m. and after a short attempt at resuscitation he was declared a stillbirth.

The complaint raises counts of negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Towles claims she suffered extreme emotional distress at the death of her child and from the defendants’ actions in conspiring to delay delivery of her son and conceal the true facts of the cause of her baby’s death.

The plaintiff is represented by Bruce G. Fagel of Los Angeles.  It could not be immediately determined who will represent the defendants.

The case is Towles v. Prime Healthcare Centinela et al., No. YC063936, Cal. Superior, Los Angeles County Dec. 29, 2010.

 


Comments (5)

3/4/2011 7:33:10 AM by Anonymous

it had nothing to do with Pitocin...

1/15/2011 11:58:29 PM by Anonymous

It's interesting that the claim is that the doctor delayed deliver when the cesarean occurred one hour after they determined it necessary. It's a misconception that emergency cesareans are performed immediately. One hour is not delayed. I bet it's within their protocol. As for promoting home birth, I would agree that the pitocin *could* have put him in distress. A corollary has been found between the use of pitocin and fetal distress. But something I find more interesting is the one hour "delay" between distress and cesarean. So many parents are scared to have a home birth/birth center birth because of the (slim) chance that they will require an emergency cesarean. What they don't realize is that time to cesarean may not be reduced if they are in the hospital. And just to have said it: The reality is that most transfers by midwives do not occur in a state of emergency.

1/15/2011 1:07:09 PM by Anonymous

First of all, by what's written, this was not a pit induction of labor. The mother arrived at the hospital in active labor and pit was one of the interventions used to accelerate labor. Second, the parents are alleging that the baby was not delivered soon enough, not that he wasn't allowed to come on his own time. Read the article next time. Third, don't use this family's tragedy as a springboard from which to advertise home birth. Hospitals don't profit from births; if they did, more hospitals would offer obstetrical services. Homebirths often result in tragedy, too, after all. By attributing the baby's death to the parents' decision to have the baby in a hospital at all, you are indirectly blaming them for the death. You are directly accusing them of being uneducated. Natural home birth isn't the solution to every single obstetrical problem. The truth is, you have no idea what led the family to make the choices they did, and since you weren't there, you have no idea what happened beyond what was stated in the article. If women want information on natural or home births, they have Google and numerous pro-homebirth websites and forums to peruse. They have books by Goer and Gaskin that Amazon and Borders carry. They don't need people taking advantage of other people's tragedies, whether it's you on this comment board or people on the other side who do it with homebirths gone wrong.

1/15/2011 10:09:58 AM by Anonymous

Had she had a natural homebirth that child would be alive. The pitocin put him in distress and forced the c-section.

1/15/2011 8:25:29 AM by Anonymous

Babies should not be induced. Not telling mothers of the dangers of induction and pitocin is negligent. Not allowing babies to progress on their own time causes trouble. Leaving mothers with strangers (nurses whom they have never met), hosptial staff of every type is not condusive to an uneventrul birth. Women who are birthing are NOT sick.But they need to feel safe, above all. It sounds as if this baby was actually destroyed by the Interventions meant to get him "delivered" rather than letting the baby come on his own time. There is not enough information in this article to tell what actually happened to the baby. But there is plenty of information about the birth "management" which is typical now. Women must educate themselves about childbirth. Do not think you will learn about it from a hospital. That is the very last place you will get information on a natural un-interfered with birth. They do not even know what such a birth is like. The information is out there. Educate yourself, so that you will not be a victim.


Register or log in to comment.

© 2012 Thomson Reuters