Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Bacardi rum, file photo 2009. REUTERS Eric Gaillard

Bacardi can face suit over woman's bar burns: court

10/13/2011 COMMENTS (1)

NEW YORK, Oct 13 (Reuters) - A woman who suffered burns when a bartender poured Bacardi 151 rum onto the bar and lit it on fire can proceed with claims against the alcohol company, a panel of judges ruled Thursday.

Lauren Sclafani said she sustained severe burns at Brother Jimmy's BBQ, in Manhattan, when the bottle itself caught fire and shot flaming liquid onto her. She sued both Bacardi and the bar in 2008.

On Thursday, the Appellate Division, First Department, upheld a 2010 ruling by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Emily Jane Goodman declining to dismiss the claims against the rum maker.

The court noted that although Bacardi included warning labels on its bottles of Bacardi 151 and installed a removable flame arrester, "it did so while actively promoting the very pyrotechnic uses that caused plaintiff's injuries."

Sclafani's lawsuit contends that Bacardi either knew or should have known that its rum was frequently used for fiery displays and that the arrester was poorly designed.

A call to Bacardi's lawyer was not immediately returned on Thursday afternoon.

The 151 in the rum's name refers to its level of alcohol, which at 75.5 percent is higher than most conventional rums.

The case is Sclafani v. Brother Jimmy's BBQ, Inc, et al, Appellate Division, First Department, New York State Supreme Court, No. 2011-01784.

For Bacardi: Jeffrey Gutchess of Hunton & Williams.

For Brother Jimmy's: Daniel Mevorach of Gallo Vitucci & Klar.

For Sclafani: Matthew Gaier of Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax)

Follow us on Twitter: @ReutersLegal 


Comments (1)

8/5/2012 11:36:45 AM by sonic007ca

I hope Bacardi wins. I dont think there is merit in this case. I myself have a bottle of 151 with my right now. I myself heed the warnings and it clearly states not to remove the flame arrester. It also says not to use this product for flaming drinks as well as not puncture the bottle. It also states not to puncture or remove the flame arrester as the bottle contents may ignite.


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters