There's a cautionary note to MBIA deep in Manhattan State
Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten's long-awaited, 27-page
loss-causation decision in MBIA's mortgage-backed securities
case against Countrywide. The bond insurer, Bransten warned,
must prove that it was damaged as a "direct result" of
Countrywide's allegedly material misrepresentations about the
MBS certificates MBIA agreed to insure. "As has been aptly
pointed out by Countrywide, this will not be an easy task," the
judge wrote.
But unless I am seriously misreading Branstein's ruling
(and her companion decision in Syncora's case) it's going to be
a lot easier for the bond insurers to recover against
Countrywide as a result of the judge's reasoning. Yes, MBIA and
Syncora have to prove they were duped into writing insurance
policies on Countrywide mortage-backed securities. The
monolines have never asserted that they don't have to show
Countrywide made material misrepresentations at the time they
agreed to issue insurance. They believe they've got plenty of
evidence -- from the MBS pooling and servicing agreements, from
the loan tapes they were permitted to see, and from the shadow
credit ratings conferred on the MBS notes -- that Countrywide
misled insurers about the quality of the mortgages in the
underlying loan pools.
Instead, the key question before Bransten was whether the
insurers would also have to show that Countrywide's alleged
misrepresentations were the direct cause of the MBS failures
for which insurers had to pay out policy claims. And on this
issue, the judge sided squarely with the monolines. "No basis
in law exists to mandate that MBIA establish a direct causal
link," she concluded.
Her rulings will permit the bond insurers to argue both
that Countrywide committed fraud in inducing them to write
policies and that Countrywide breached its insurance agreements
with Syncora and MBIA. To establish fraud, MBIA and Syncora
will have to show that they relied on Countrywide's alleged
misrepresentations when they agreed to write the specific
policies at issue in the litigation. To prove a breach of the
insurance agreements, they need only prove that Countrywide
materially misrepresented the risk profile of the underlying
mortgage pools. There are, in other words, a lot of routes to
recovery for Syncora and MBIA -- and given that Bransten is the
leading jurist in the monoline MBS litigation, for other bond
insurers as well, assuming other New York state-court judges
adopt her thinking.
MBIA and Syncora even still have a possibility of recovery
on their alternate put-back theory, although Bransten denied
them summary judgment on put-backs in Tuesday's rulings. The
bond insurers had argued that Countrywide breached MBS pooling
and servicing agreements when it allegedly misrepresented the
quality of the underlying loan pools so it's liable, under
those contracts, to put-back any deficient mortgages -- the
same put-back claims some MBS investors have made against
issuers. The judge denied summary judgment because she found
that the Countrywide pooling and servicing contract language is
ambiguous. That's a boon to Countrywide's parent, Bank of
America, and to other MBS issuers facing put-back claims. (More
on that tomorrow.) But for the bond insurers, the put-back
contract claims -- which are still alive, even though Bransten
denied summary judgment -- were always an alternative route to
the damages they also sought under their insurance- law
claims.
And under Bransten's rulings, even if the bond insurers end
up with nothing on their put-back claims, they can still
recover everything they've paid out on Countrywide MBS claims.
That's because the judge adopted the monolines' theory of
"rescissory damages," finding that if MBIA and Syncora prove
their cases, they're entitled to be made whole by Countrywide,
as if they'd never written insurance on Countrywide MBS. Again,
if Bransten's reasoning on rescissory damages guides other New
York State judges, Ambac and Assured Guaranty also have reason
to cheer her rulings.
For the record (as if you didn't know), MBIA is represented
by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Syncora by Debevoise &
Plimpton; and Countrywide by Goodwin Procter.
(Reporting by Alison Frankel)
Follow Alison on Twitter: @AlisonFrankel
Follow us on Twitter: @ReutersLegal