Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Prayer, stock. REUTERS Thomas Peter_Small

2nd Circuit finds NY town prayers unconstitutional

5/17/2012 COMMENTS (0)

May 17 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Thursday revived a challenge against the town of Greece in upstate New York over its policy of holding opening prayers at town board meetings.

The New York-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit found that the prayer policy aligned the town with Christianity in violation of the Establishment Clause, which prevents the government from favoring one religion over another.

"The town's desire to mark the solemnity of its proceedings with a prayer is understandable; Americans have done just that for more than two hundred years. But when one creed dominates others -- regardless of a town's intentions -- constitutional concerns come to the fore," Judge Guido Calabresi wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel.

Two Greece residents, Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, complained in 2007 that the town board only invited Christian clergy to deliver the invocation. The next year, the town invited a Wiccan priestess, a chairman of a local Baha'i congregation and a lay Jewish man to give the prayer. But prayers at eight of the 12 meetings were Christian.

Galloway and Stephens sued the town and its supervisor in 2008, challenging the prayer practice under the Establishment Clause. The district court ruled in the town's favor before a trial, finding that town employees did not intentionally exclude any particular faiths and did not restrict the content of the prayers.

But the 2nd Circuit panel reversed that decision on Thursday, finding that the town's process for selecting speakers virtually ensured a Christian viewpoint. Even though most of the congregations in Greece were Christian, the town could have invited clergy from outside its borders, the panel found.

Joel Oster of the Alliance Defense Fund, which represents Greece, said the town was prepared to appeal the case as far as the Supreme Court.

"The court wants the town to be prayer monitors, to determine how many prayers in Jesus' name are too many," he said. That outcome violates the Establishment Clause, he said. Oster pointed to a 2008 ruling by the 11th Circuit in Pelphrey v. Cobb County, Georgia, upholding a county commission's opening prayer policy.

But Ayesha Khan, a lawyer with Americans United for Separation of Church and State who represented the plaintiffs before the 2nd Circuit, said the prayer givers in Cobb County were more diverse than in Greece.

"Municipalities need to ensure that no single religion is advanced in their prayers, and they have to take a fairly active role in ensuring constitutional compliance," she said.

In a different case in January, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal by Forsyth County, leaving in place a 4th Circuit ruling that stopped sectarian prayers at county board meetings.

The 2nd Circuit case is Galloway et al v. Town of Greece et al, No. 10-3635.

For Galloway et al: Ayesha Khan of Americans United for Separation of church and State.

For Greece: Joel Oster of the Alliance Defense Fund.

(Reporting By Terry Baynes)

Follow us on Twitter: @ReutersLegal  |  Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters