June 28 (Reuters) - As the justices handed down their decision on President Barack Obama's healthcare law this morning, Reuters was on-site to cover both the historic ruling and the histrionics on the steps of the Supreme Court.

From the belly dancers gyrating for "change" to spot analysis of Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion, our reporters live-blogged the entire event.

For a look back at our minute-by-minute coverage, visit our archived live blog.

To research other cases, check out Reuters' interactive look at the Supreme Court's full 2011-12 term, including case summaries, information on the lawyers, firms and agencies behind every fight and links to important legal briefs and headlines. 

Additional Supreme Court coverage: 

Supreme Court upholds Obama's healthcare law 

"The ... requirement that certain individuals pay a financial penalty for not obtaining health insurance may reasonably be characterized as a tax," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.

Broccoli, cellphones and the Obama healthcare law 

At issue on Day 2: Whether Congress has the power to require people to buy medical insurance or face a penalty -- a key provision of the Affordable Care Act.

Twitter coverage of Supreme Court gets shut down 

A lawyer discovered how far the high court will go to close itself off from the public when it hears a case, no matter how many people on Twitter may be interested.

Analysis - The U.S. Immigration Ruling: A Hint on Healthcare? 

The Supreme Court's decision in the Arizona immigration case showed a conciliatory streak within a divided court. The impulse could emerge again when the justices issue their climactic healthcare opinion.

Stern Advice: The Supreme Court, healthcare and you 

The political consequences of the justices' decision may be immediate and severe. But what about the ramifications for healthcare consumers?

U.S. Supreme Court: Never mind the 9. Meet the 36. 

The focus may be on their bosses, but the court's 36 law clerks are not without influence. Here's how their research, opinions and past jobs may impact the justices' ruling on healthcare.

In the healthcare case, orphans get parents 

Two lawyers have been chosen by the Supreme Court to present so-called orphan arguments -- positions neither side in the case will defend but which the nine justices have a keen interest in hearing.

With friends like these 

So many friends. So little love. Such is the state of the amicus, or "friend of the court," briefs that have piled up in the upcoming case involving President Obama's healthcare reform law.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook