Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

Cross, file photo. REUTERS Eliana Aponte

Judge dismisses states' suit over contraception mandate

7/17/2012 COMMENTS (0)

July 17 (Reuters) - A Nebraska federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit brought by seven states against a government regulation requiring employers to provide birth-control coverage to employees.

U.S. District Judge Warren Urbom concluded that the plaintiffs did not face immediate harm and therefore could not sue to block the part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 that requires employers to include free birth control in their healthcare programs.

The Nebraska Attorney General filed the suit in February on behalf of six other states, two Catholic individuals and three Catholic non-profit institutions. The suit was one of around two dozen filed across the country by religious organizations accusing the federal government of forcing them to face steep fines if they did not support contraception, sterilization and birth control in violation of their religious beliefs.

 SUPREME COURT: Healthcare ruling
* Why Roberts saved Obama’s healthcare law
* Ruling
* Court upholds Obamacare with barely a legal ripple
* The basics: healthcare, reform and the high court
* A primer on the principle of severability
* Chronology of the legal battle
* Archive: Live-blogging the decision
* Interactive: The 2011-2012 Supreme Court
* Full Coverage

The states, which include Texas, Ohio and Florida, argued that the law threatened their budgets by giving religious employers an incentive to stop providing health insurance coverage to their employees to avoid the requirements of the rule. That would drive up enrollment in the states' Medicaid programs, they contended.

But the judge concluded that the alleged harms were too remote and hypothetical. The federal government has carved out an exemption for religious employers, announcing that insurance companies would cover the cost of birth control for their coverage plans. In addition, the government has delayed enforcement of the rule until August 1, 2013, while the Department of Health and Human Services figures out how the accommodation for religious employers will work.

The judge also found that the states could not show any direct injury from the contraception mandate.

"There are no allegations of direct injuries resulting from the Rule; instead, the State plaintiffs only speculate that third parties will respond to the Rule in such a way that the States' budgets will ultimately be strained," Urbom wrote. States are not entitled to religious protections under the First Amendment or federal law, he added.

Katherine Spohn, a lawyer for the Nebraska Attorney General's Office, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Michelle Bennett, a Justice Department lawyer for the federal defendants, was not immediately available for comment.

In May, the law firm Jones Day filed 12 suits in courts across the country on behalf of 43 different Catholic entities, including Notre Dame, Catholic University of America and the Archdiocese of New York.

The Nebraska case is the first to be dismissed by a federal judge, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.

The case is State of Nebraska et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al, U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, No. 4:12-cv-3035.

For Nebraska et al: Katherine Spohn of the Nebraska Attorney General's Office.

For the Catholic individuals and institutions: Rocky Weber of the Crosby, Guenzel Law Firm; Donald Blankenau of the Blankenau, Wilmoth Law Firm.

For the federal government: Michelle Bennett of the Justice Department. 

(Reporting By Terry Baynes)

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters