Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Drywall No Credit iStock photo

Chinese drywall maker must face U.S. lawsuits - judge

9/5/2012 COMMENTS (1)

By Andrew Longstreth

NEW YORK, Sept 4 (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge has ruled that a Chinese drywall maker must face claims over its allegedly tainted product, which has been blamed for causing foul odors, the failure of appliances and health problems.

The ruling means homeowners will be able to pursue claims against the Chinese firm in U.S. courts, increasing the pressure for a settlement similar to that reached between plaintiffs and a German drywall maker last year.

Judge Eldon Fallon of New Orleans on Monday denied motions by Taishan Gypsum Co Ltd to dismiss four lawsuits filed by homeowners whose properties were allegedly affected by faulty drywall.

Fallon also denied a request by Taishan to vacate a $2.6 million default judgment that he levied against the company in May 2010 after it had failed to make appearances in one of the cases.

The ruling is the latest victory for plaintiffs in hundreds of drywall lawsuits that have been consolidated in New Orleans federal court.

Last year, homeowners in the litigation settled with German company Knauf International over claims involving drywall manufactured by its Chinese subsidiary. As part of the settlement, funds were created to repair affected homes and compensate homeowners for economic losses and bodily harm.

Russ Herman, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he hoped that Fallon's ruling would encourage Taishan to negotiate a similar settlement.

After Fallon entered the $2.6 million judgment against Taishan, the company's lawyers made appearances in the case and argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the company because of its lack of contacts with the United States.

"We believe that the Court was in error for all the reasons reflected in our papers and discussed at the hearing," said Joe Cyr, an attorney for Taishan.

The consolidated cases are in Re: Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 09-md-2047.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Comments (1)

9/5/2012 12:06:46 PM by hoodwinked1

Homeowners in litigation with German company Knauf have not settled, the proposed settlement is at best a doctrine of corporate welfare. Where the proposed settlement takes aim is to segregate the plaintiffs as to minimize the damages which plaintiffs incurred. This is no class action where one receives a check for $1.20 and the lawyers receive their large payout. As those parties continue to express their innocent in this diaster one can only imagine the devestation to many families who were forced to flee their homes or left to fen for them selfs in living in contaminated homes.Is justice being served by a negociated settlement that clearly leaves plantiffs in negociating with the company who let this diaster fester in the market place.Current proposal is inadequate to properly address the loss of all plaintiffs in the MDL.The proposed settlement is a blank piece of paper which after the fact could leave plaintiffs with out any recourse to cover their complete loss.


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters