Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

Examination paper. REUTERS Lisi Niesner_Small

Law School Admission Test is discriminatory, U.S. government says

9/6/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By David Ingram

WASHINGTON, Sept 6 (Reuters) - The federal government wants to throw its support behind a group of prospective lawyers who accuse those running the Law School Admission Test of discriminating against test takers with disabilities.

Lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department on Wednesday filed a motion to intervene in a class action in federal court in San Francisco.

The motion said the LSAT's organizer, the Law School Admission Council, discriminates against people with disabilities in two ways: by having onerous or vague standards for how much documentation the council requires and by informing law schools of which test takers received disability-related accommodations.

The Law School Admission Council has denied the accusations. Its motion to dismiss the lawsuit is pending. A spokeswoman on Thursday had no additional comment.

The admissions offices of U.S. law schools generally require applicants to take the LSAT.

In a statement on Thursday, Thomas Perez, the U.S. assistant attorney general for civil rights, said that the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 "demands that each individual with a disability have the opportunity to fairly demonstrate their abilities so they can pursue their dreams."

California's Department of Fair Employment and Housing brought the class action in March.

It is rare for the Justice Department to attempt to intervene in a class action, but it said the case is important to the enforcement of the disabilities law.

The department's proposed intervention lays out examples from those who have attended law school, or who want to, and say they have been discriminated against.

The practice of telling law schools about LSAT accommodations, known as flagging, announces to admissions officers "that examinees who exercise their civil right to the testing accommodation of extended time may not deserve the scores they received," the Justice Department said.

The Law School Admission Council in a July 11 court brief called that a novel argument.

"DOJ made no such claim when it entered into a settlement agreement with LSAC in 2002 after conducting a lengthy investigation of LSAC's accommodation policies and practices," the council said.

The case is Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Law School Admission Council Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:12-cv-1830.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook   


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters