Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

A detainee at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. REUTERS Handout

U.S. appeals court to hear military detention case

10/2/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By Basil Katz

NEW YORK, Oct 2 (Reuters) - A federal court has agreed to hear an appeal by the United States government of a judge's ruling that blocked the indefinite military detention of terrorism suspects.

The ruling by U.S District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan had found unconstitutional part of a statute that authorizes indefinite military detention for people deemed to have "substantially supported" al Qaeda, the Taliban or "associated forces."

The Justice Department, which represents President Barack Obama, argued that Forrest's Sept. 12 injunction barring enforcement of a portion of the National Defense Authorization Act's "Homeland Battlefield" provisions would harm U.S. war efforts abroad.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted an emergency freeze of the ruling on Sept. 18. On Tuesday, the court said it would consider arguments in the case on an "expedited schedule" and extended the stay pending its decision.

"On its face, the statute does not affect the existing rights of United States citizens or other individuals arrested in the United States," the 2nd Circuit wrote in Tuesday's order. "The public interest weighs in favor of granting the government's motion for a stay."

The case stems from a lawsuit filed in January by former New York Times war correspondent and Pulitzer Prize winner Chris Hedges and others. They said they had no assurance that their writing and advocacy activities would not fall under the scope of the provisions.

The United States argued that the plaintiffs had no basis to fear being locked up for their activities and that the judge's order interfered with the president's powers at a time of war.

In agreeing to hear the appeal, judges Denny Chin, Raymond Lohier and Christopher Droney said all legal briefs must be submitted by mid-December. Oral argument would be scheduled soon after, the judges said.

Carl Mayer, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said they disagree with the decision to stay the case but that "the appeals court is obviously taking this very seriously."

The cases are Hedges v. Obama, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 12-cv-331, and Hedges v. Obama, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 12-3176.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook     


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters