Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

BP logo REUTERS Suzanne Plunkett

Breakingviews: BP's Macondo deal comes with criminal hangover

11/15/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By Kevin Allison

LONDON, Nov 15 (Reuters Breakingviews) - A sigh of relief is in order at BP. The embattled UK oil major settled U.S. federal criminal charges and some civil ones for $4.5 billion - less than feared. But BP's legal troubles stemming from its 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill will continue. Its admission of criminal guilt could be used against it in a high-stakes civil trial. No wonder investors aren't yet cheering.

Still, both sides can take some satisfaction in the deal, announced on Thursday. The U.S. Justice Department gets to look tough: BP's $4.5 billion penalty includes a $1.3 billion criminal fine, the biggest ever levied by Uncle Sam. Meanwhile, for BP the impact is manageable, at about 10 weeks of last year's cash flow from operations, to be paid in installments over six years.

The company will take a $3.85 billion charge against income, bringing its total provisions for the disaster to $42 billion. In return, it gets out from under two of the big legal cases remaining after its pact with private plaintiffs in March - the other, smaller part of the latest settlement is a deal with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In January, Morgan Stanley estimated that the criminal probe alone could cost BP $5 billion to $15 billion. By that yardstick, the company escaped relatively lightly.

One twist, though, is that BP's guilty pleas on 14 counts, which are part of the settlement, can be introduced in evidence in a related civil trial beginning in February in New Orleans. The central issue is whether BP was, in legal terms, grossly negligent in the disaster. If so, its fines under the U.S. Clean Water Act could balloon to a maximum $21 billion, versus up to $5.4 billion if BP's missteps aren't found to have reached that level.

BP plans a vigorous defense. It says its guilty pleas are consistent with conduct that was merely negligent, not grossly so. The feds will no doubt relish BP having to convince a judge of that, in the light of the criminal admissions. At a minimum, they surely give the U.S. government leverage in negotiating a further, civil settlement. That might help explain why BP's New York-listed ADRs were up just 0.6 percent in 3 p.m. trading, adding a modest $700 million of market value. The settlement is a step forward, but the Macondo nightmare isn't over yet.

 

CONTEXT NEWS

- BP on Nov. 15 said it had reached agreement with the U.S. government, subject to court approval, to resolve all federal criminal charges and all claims by the Securities and Exchange Commission against the company stemming from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident, oil spill, and response.

- The settlement of criminal charges with the Justice Department involves a payment of $4 billion, including nearly $1.3 billion in fines, in installments over five years. BP will also pay the SEC $525 million.

- The company said it had agreed to plead guilty to 14 criminal charges, 11 relating to the 11 lives lost in the accident.

- A separate civil trial to apportion blame for the disaster is due to begin in New Orleans in February.

- BP said it would continue to vigorously defend itself against all remaining civil claims, which include federal civil claims under the Clean Water Act, federal and state natural resource damages claims, certain private civil claims and securities claims, state economic loss claims, and miscellaneous private civil claims pending in other federal and state courts.

- BP's New York-listed ADRs were up 0.6 percent in 3 p.m. trading on Nov. 15. 

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook   


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters