Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Hundred dollar bills money sheet REUTERS Photographer

White Plains loses bid to block $291,000 legal fee

11/15/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By Basil Katz 

NEW YORK, Nov 15 (Reuters) - Two New York lawyers can get almost $291,000 in legal fees from the city of White Plains after obtaining a $30,000 settlement for their clients in a false arrest case, a U.S. appeals court ruled.

In an opinion on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said that while the award to attorneys Michael Spiegel and Scott Korenbaum "could give pause," a lower court judge did not abuse his discretion in approving it.

The case stems from the April 2004 arrest of three women on charges including resisting arrest and assault after they asked White Plains police officers why they were roughly questioning one of their friends, the opinion said. The police used "excessive force" in arresting the women, the opinion said.

The three women were cleared at trial. They subsequently sued the city and the police officers for false arrest and malicious prosecution. That case settled after four years of litigation for $30,000 before trial in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

Judge Robert Patterson, who oversaw the dispute, in 2011 also approved $290,997.94 in attorneys' fees and litigation costs for the women's lawyers to be paid by the city of White Plains. The city appealed the award, saying the judge had abused his discretion and that the fees were disproportionate to the settlement amount.

Circuit Judges Reena Raggi, Peter Hall and Susan Carney, however, said fees could not be reduced just because they appeared to be disproportionate. The per curiam opinion also noted that the city had never objected to the lawyers' hourly rates.

"While the total amount of fees and the hourly rates charged by counsel in this case could give pause, defendants neither object to those rates nor demonstrate any abuse of discretion relating to the calculation of the fee award," the appeals ruling said.

Attorneys for the city of White Plains and for the two lawyers were not immediately available to comment on the ruling.

The case is Deja Barbour v. City of White Plains, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-2229.

For the plaintiffs: Michael Spiegel of New York.

For the city of White Plains: Joseph Maria of White Plains.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook  


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters