Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

Gavel and law books No Credit iStock Photo

Group claims Rutgers-Camden Law used misleading employment data

12/31/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By Daniel Wiessner

ALBANY, N.Y., Dec 31 (Reuters) - A non-profit group has filed a complaint claiming that Rutgers School of Law - Camden misrepresented alumni employment statistics in a recruiting letter.

Law School Transparency, a legal education watchdog group, said in the complaint filed with the American Bar Association on Monday that Camille Andrews, an associate dean at the school, made "misleading and false statements" about graduates' employment and salaries in an email to prospective students.

The email was sent in May to an unknown number of people -- including many MBA students -- who had not expressed any interest in law school or legal practice, the group said.

"By portraying Rutgers-Camden as a down-economy safe haven that leads to status and riches, the school attempted to enroll the exact students who ought not to attend law school: people who have not had time to carefully weigh the pros and cons of this significant investment," the 10-page complaint said.

The group said the Rutgers letter violated Section 509 of the ABA Standards, which requires that any consumer information published by a law school be "complete, accurate and not misleading."

A spokeswoman for the law school declined to comment on Monday and said Dean Rayman Solomon was not available to comment. Andrews did not respond to a request for comment.

The recruiting email was published by the legal blog Above the Law in May. Two days later, Law School Transparency called for Andrews's resignation.

RUTGERS REPORT

In response, according to the complaint, Rutgers-Camden commissioned a report on the matter but did not admit wrongdoing or retract the statistics used in the letter.

According to the complaint, Andrews said in the email that "of those (Rutgers-Camden graduates) employed nine months after graduation, 90 percent were employed in the legal field."

But only 64 percent of the school's 242 graduates of 2011 are currently working as lawyers, according to the complaint, and another 11 percent have legal jobs that do not require a JD. The remaining quarter of the 2011 class is not working in the legal field, the group said.

Law School Transparency also claims the recruiting letter misrepresented the average salaries of Rutgers-Camden graduates. The letter claims the "average starting salary for a 2011 graduate who enters private practice is in excess of $74,000, with many top students" earning more than $130,000.

The complaint claims that less than half of 2011 graduates actually reported their income, and those who did tended to work at large firms that offered better pay. Graduates who work at small firms or are unemployed are underrepresented in the statistics, the group said.

The complaint comes as some 15 law schools nationwide, including four in New York, are facing lawsuits that allege they published inflated or misrepresented employment statistics in order to lure prospective students.

Five of those cases have been dismissed but are on appeal, according to Jesse Strauss, a New York attorney who is representing the plaintiffs in all but one of the lawsuits. The others are awaiting decisions on motions to dismiss or are proceeding to discovery, Strauss said on Monday.

Kyle McEntee, the executive director of Law School Transparency, said in an interview Monday that his group is not currently planning a lawsuit against Rutgers-Camden, one of three law schools in New Jersey.

When the ABA receives a complaint against a law school, it convenes a committee to investigate the claims. The ABA may then dismiss the complaint or impose a range of remedial measures, including fines, loss of accreditation or requiring a school to update its employment and admission statistics and recruiting material.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters