Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Summary Judgments Logo

Summary Judgments for December 12

12/12/2012 COMMENTS (0)

Quiet, please

12/12/12

By Caitlin Tremblay

It's finals time at the University of Memphis Law School this week, so, naturally, some totally understanding law professors decided to throw their holiday party in the library reading room. Nor was it your average milling-about-over-cocktails-and-polite-conversation holiday fete either -- there was a live band.

According to Above The Law, the soiree prevented students from using the reading room and disrupted others studying elsewhere in the library.

ATL has photographic evidence of the room being closed for the evening and points out that only a ridiculous party runs from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m., which this one did. There's also a quote from an angry 1L student describing how classmates felt about the situation. The general consensus? They were "at a loss for words."

Smooth move, law profs. Perhaps during spring finals week you can reserve the whole library and stage a pop-up carnival.

Mandate for change

12/12/12

By Dan Brillman

Is it time to revisit mandatory sentencing? The New York Times reports on the case of Stephanie George, who was sent to prison for life, without parole, in 1997 for cocaine possession. Even though the drugs belonged to a boyfriend (George claims she had no knowledge they were in her house), the Floridian will never again see the light of day, short of a commutation or pardon, because the amount of drugs found (half a kilo) mandated the sentence.

Statistics quoted by the Times show that mandatory sentences for non-violent crimes have helped make those offenders half the U.S. prison population. Federal court judge Roger Vinson, who sentenced George, told her at the time that she did not deserve the sentence, but his hands were tied by the law. He says he regrets the ordeal.

"The punishment is supposed to fit the crime, but when a legislative body says this is going to be the sentence no matter what other factors there are, that's draconian in every sense of the word," Vinson says. "Mandatory sentences breed injustice."

Mandatory minimums are embraced by prosecutors as a deterrent that also give them leverage in going after bigger fish. But Vinson says menial workers in drug schemes often get hit the hardest because they have little to no practical information to offer. George's then boyfriend, the ringleader of the drug-dealing operation, was released five years ago, after getting a reduced sentence in exchange for aiding the prosecution with evidence. Meanwhile, George works two jobs, one that pays 92 cents an hour, partly so she can afford the 23 cent per minute calls to her children every Sunday.

Where the money is

12/12/12

By Erin Geiger Smith

If, like rapper Travie McCoy, you want to be a billionaire, it appears you should use your law degree for something other than practicing law.

The wealthiest lawyers in America, according to a video by Bloomberg Law, did not make their fortunes from putting in hours reading case law and conducting due diligence. The fourth-richest lawyer in America, for instance, is Randa Duncan Williams, daughter of oil billionaire Dan Duncan, with a net worth $5.1 billion. Before joining the family business, Williams practiced toxic tort law in Houston, says Bloomberg. Prize for third richest, at $6 billion, is New York real estate scion Richard LeFrak. No. 2, with $8.7 billion, is Richard Kinder, who practiced law in Houston before joining his friend Ken Lay at Enron and then became CEO of energy company Kinder Morgan.

At the top position? You'll have to watch the video, but it's someone whose father founded a retail giant and who has probably put his law degree to use this year studying the ins and outs of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

(Hat tip to the ABA Journal for pointing out the Bloomberg video, which itself credited a post by Above the Law for inspiring a look into lawyer's bank accounts.)

Law of the jungle

12/12/12

By Suhrith Parthasarathy

A new Ohio law governing ownership of exotic creatures is being challenged by some owners of wild animals in federal district court, reports The Plain Dealer. The law was enacted this year after Ohio resident Terry Thompson freed dozens of wild animals he kept on his property before killing himself. The new rules ban the ownership, breeding, sale and purchase of certain animals as of Jan. 1, 2014, and allow existing owners to keep their animals only if they implant microchips in their animals, pay permit fees and maintain the animals in cages of specified dimensions.

Terry Wilkins, who owns reptiles in Columbus, told district court judge George C. Smith that he will have to shut down his retail operation if the law is allowed to stand, The Columbus Dispatch reports. According to Wilkins, the microchips are not safe for alligators and can cause snakes to become sterile. Another plaintiff, Cyndi Huntsman, testified that inserting tracking microchips will threaten the well-being of some older animals. The sedation is "a death sentence for them," she told the court. "I'm not willing to do that. And I'll fight as long as I have to."

Veterinarians testifying on behalf of the state, however, said inserting the microchips is very important. "I've microchipped many animals that didn't even know it was happening," Dr. Paul A. Strull told the court, according to the Dispatch. The Humane Society has joined the state in defending the law. Ralph Henry, its director, told The Plain Dealer that microchipping is no more dangerous than vaccinating dogs and cats.

Stop and frisk (and call in)

12/12/12

By Suhrith Parthasarathy

Colorado spends an estimated $13 million a year enforcing a 2006 law that mandates cops to report unauthorized immigrants to federal officials, the Denver Westwood reports. (Hat-tip: National Journal.) The law, known as SB 90, was passed at a time when paranoia over illegal immigration was high, as the website points out.

Under SB 90, when a police officer arrests someone for a criminal charge and has probable cause to believe the person is undocumented, he is to report the arrestee to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. If the person posts bond, he is held for a further 48 hours to give ICE time to pick him up. In cases where no bond is posted, ICE must wait till the arrestee is taken to court and has served his sentence before taking custody of him. This procedure, according to a report by the Colorado Fiscal Institute, means those arrestees spend an average of 22 days longer in county jails than other arrestees.

The report pays particular attention to Denver, where the majority of people reported to ICE in 2010 and 2011 were in jail for minor offences, which runs counter to federal directives to target more serious offenders, the Denver Westwood says. The law in these two years has cost taxpayers in the city a total of $1.8 million, according to the study. 

Summary Judgments for December 11

Summary Judgments for December 10

Summary Judgments for December 7

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters