Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Businessman with briefcase, file photo. REUTERS Yuriko Nakao_Small

Dismissal of ex-associate's lawsuit against Kasowitz upheld

1/23/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK, Jan 23 (Reuters) - A New York appeals court has upheld the dismissal of a $77 million lawsuit against Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman filed by a lawyer who claimed he was fired after touting his "superior legal mind" in an email to the firm's partners.

In a single-sentence ruling, a unanimous panel at the Appellate Division, First Department, on Tuesday affirmed Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten's decision in January 2012 to toss the complaint of former first-year associate Gregory Berry.

The panel cited a severance agreement Berry signed with the firm upon his departure.

"Plaintiff's claims are barred by the release and were properly dismissed," the appeals court wrote.

Berry, who is now practicing as a solo attorney, claimed the firm fired him in May 2011, days after he emailed partners to ask for more responsibility.

"It has become clear that I have as much experience and ability as an associate many years my senior, as much skill writing and a superior legal mind to most I have met," his email said, according to the complaint. He was subsequently told by a partner that he had "burned bridges" with his email, the lawsuit asserted.

He accused the firm of behaving unethically, inflicting emotional distress and attempting to ruin his career.

Kasowitz responded in court papers that Berry had breached a confidential severance agreement that paid him $27,000 in exchange for a release waiving any claims against the firm.

Berry said in an email statement that the release he signed did not "bar actions to enforce the agreement itself" and that the firm had breached the agreement.

"As the court did not justify their decision, it is difficult to comment further," he said.

The lawyer for Kasowitz who argued the case, Joseph Piesco, did not immediately return a request for comment.

The panel included Justices David Friedman, Dianne Renwick, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, Nelson Roman and Darcel Clark.

The case is Berry v. Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, Appellate Division, First Department, No. 9051.

For Berry: Pro se.

For Kasowitz: Joseph Piesco of Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook  


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters