Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

The Danish Queen aboard the USS Sequoia. REUTERS Mike Theiler

Former presidential yacht subject of 'dastardly' takeover plan: lawsuit

1/11/2013 COMMENTS (1)

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - A lawyer who owns the former presidential yacht has filed a lawsuit against a company accusing it of a "dastardly plan" to force him into financial distress and acquire the boat at a discounted price.

The Sequoia was the presidential yacht for five decades, serving presidents from Herbert Hoover to Jimmy Carter until it was decommissioned in 1977. Gary Silversmith, a lawyer and developer who bought it in 2000, describes it in his lawsuit as "possibly the most important piece of Americana not owned by the United States government."

Silversmith filed a lawsuit this week in Manhattan Supreme Court against FE Partners, asserting the company deliberately withheld part of a $5 million loan to Silversmith and then falsely claimed he defaulted in an effort to take control of the boat. The loan terms permitted FE to purchase the yacht at a discounted price if he failed to pay back the loan.

"Defendant developed and then instituted a dastardly plan to wrest control of the Sequoia from plaintiffs," the lawsuit said.

Silversmith is seeking an order preventing FE Partners from buying the yacht.

In a statement, Richard Graf, an attorney for FE Partners, said the lawsuit was "grossly inaccurate and without merit."

According to the boat's website, the Sequoia was the site of various historical moments, including John F. Kennedy's final birthday party and high-level cabinet and diplomatic meetings.

Silversmith acquired the yacht in 2000 and spent millions to restore it.

Following the economic downturn, Silversmith had difficulty affording necessary repairs and secured a loan to help cover capital costs from FE Partners, a company controlled by a wealthy Indian family, the Timblos, the complaint said.

They agreed on a $5 million loan that included an option to buy the yacht for $13 million. The deal also allowed FE Partners to buy the yacht for $7.8 million in the event of a default.

According to the lawsuit, FE Partners was obligated to pay S3.9 million in the loan's first installment but only gave him $2.5 million, ensuring that he would have trouble meeting his financial obligations.

FE Partners then asserted in numerous notices that he had defaulted, claiming variously that Silversmith had failed to pay off certain debts, was late in paying his employees and allowed guests to bring prostitutes on board, all allegations Silversmith denied in the complaint. The company informed Silversmith it planned to exercise its option to buy the yacht for $7.8 million.

"Defendant's actions are motivated by nothing more than overwhelming avarice and the malicious desire to wrest the Sequoia from Sequoia LLC for the benefit of the Timblo family," the complaint claimed.

Graf, the lawyer for FE, said the company would fight Silversmith for control of the yacht.

"It is our intent to preserve the Sequoia Presidential Yacht -- and other historically significant antique vessels -- so that future generations of Americans will be able to enjoy and appreciate these treasured American artifacts," he said.

The case is The Sequoia Presidential Yacht Group v. FE Partners, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, No. 650045/2013.

For Silversmith: Larry Hutcher and Joshua Krakowsky of Davidoff Hutcher & Citron.

For FE Partners: John Vukelj of DLA Piper.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook  


Comments (1)

1/28/2013 8:47:04 AM by GFODDone

I read this article with much interest and remained waiting for some comments by American readers. It seems there is none, so far. In May 2012 I published this video about the presidential yacht USS Williamsburg: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4_ViPgKHBE. Maybe it's a bit too long but the many comments testify that under many aspects it was appreciated. In my video I "attached" some of the story of Sequoia, so that's why I'm informed about her and the wonderful job tha Gary Silversmith had done so far. So far....until I read this sad story of a loan and a court case. My question is: in a Country like the US is it necessary to seek the help of a foreign investor to safeguard the "possibly the most important piece of Americana not owned by the United States government.", a piece of American heritage that should be the pride of many Americans? The little interest aroused by USS Williamsburg seems to confirm that sort of a lack on interest really exists.


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters