By David Ingram
WASHINGTON, Jan 22 (Reuters) - Supporters of medical
marijuana may have some evidence to back up their claims of its
health benefits, but not enough to overrule the U.S.
government's judgment that the drug should be tightly
controlled, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.
The ruling means the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
can keep marijuana on its list of the most dangerous, tightly
controlled drugs, alongside heroin.
Medical marijuana supporters sued over the DEA's
classification in 2011, and they hoped the suit would build on
victories at the ballot box in states such as Colorado and
Washington.
But the challengers, including a disabled veteran from
Virginia, failed to show convincingly that marijuana has an
effective, accepted and safe medical use, said the U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C.
Without further scientific evidence, the court must defer to
the DEA, wrote Judge Harry Edwards for a 2-1 majority. The third
judge also sided with the DEA but for a different reason,
finding that none of the challengers had a right to sue.
Since 1970, the U.S. government has classified marijuana as
a Schedule I drug, a category it reserves for drugs with no
accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.
The case is Americans for Safe Access, et al, v. Drug
Enforcement Administration, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit, No. 11-1265.
Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook