Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Summary Judgments Logo

Summary Judgments for January 10

1/10/2013 COMMENTS (0)

Taste of victory 

1/10/13

By Caitlin Tremblay 

People with food allergies and digestive ailments who want access to specialized edibles have found a surprising ally in the Justice Department, NPR reports.

In 2009, students of Lesley University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, filed a complaint with the DoJ, claiming that the college was in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 because its meal plans were inadequate for students with food allergies or other diseases.

After an investigation, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division agreed with the students and now has announced a settlement with Lesley. The school will not only pay the students $50,000 in damages, but will also provide them with gluten- and allergen-free options in the dining halls and offer special meal plans to students with allergies. It was the first allergy-related settlement under the ADA in higher education.

The agreement turns food into an access issue, something made possible in 2008 when Congress broadened the scope of the ADA to accommodate people with food allergies, says NPR.

Curb your litigation 

1/10/13

By Dan Brillman 

When the Computer Electronics Show, the techie trade-show extravaganza held annually in Las Vegas, carves out time to discuss a legal thorn, you know it has to be a pressing industry issue.

In between discussions of bendable screens and smartforks, this year's attendees on Tuesdaygot the chance to hear a panel with U.S. representative Pete DeFazio (D-OR), who talked about how to deal with patent trolls, businesses that buy patents for the sole purpose of bringing lawsuits against alleged infringers. As ArsTechnica reports, DeFazio is in the process of drawing up a modified version of the SHIELD Act, an anti-troll bill he introduced in Congress last year.

DeFazio listened to businesspeople talk about massive legal bills that they have to pass on to customers and the feeling that they're being extorted by trolls. "All they (trolls) offer is the right not to be sued," said Lee Cheng, Chief Legal Officer at computer retailer Newegg.

One of the SHIELD Act's main features is designed to curb lawsuits brought by trolls. It would put them on the hook for the defendant's legal costs should the defendant win the case. Other ideas included making it less costly to challenge a patent's validity with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

War crime debate 

1/10/13

By Suhrith Parthasarathy 

Al Qaeda facilitator Ali al Bahlul, who made propaganda videos for Osama bin Laden, was convicted in 2008 of providing material support to a terrorist. But now the Justice Department has filed a brief in a Washington appeals court arguing that the conviction must be vacated, reports The Washington Post. The Justice Department still maintains that al Bahlul's conviction was constitutional, but it filed the brief in the wake of a ruling by the same appeals court reversing the conviction of Salim Hamdan, bin Laden's former driver and bodyguard, on charges of providing material support for terrorism.

The DoJ says that the decision in the Hamdan case, which found that providing support for terrorism was not a war crime at the time of Hamdan's alleged conduct from 1996 to 2001, was flawed. By filing a brief to have the al Bahlul case vacated, the Justice Department may be signaling its intention to appeal both decisions to either a full court of appeals or the Supreme Court, says the Post.

Earlier in the week, Charlie Savage of The New York Times reported that the Obama administration's legal team was divided on whether to drop the two terrorism cases. A number of opposing memorandums had been passed around the legal department, and the final decision was in the hands of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr.

Failed-firm lessons 

9/10/13

By Casey Sullivan 

Dewey & LeBoeuf. Howrey. Thelen. These once-prestigious law firms that met untimely demises are bound by a few common symptoms that should now serve as lessons for others, according to an advisory written by Brad Hildebrandt, the chairman of Hildebrandt Consulting.

Among traps that law firm managing partners should avoid: overly ambitious business plans that aim to open offices and hire partners quicker than a law firm is financially able; not having the right mix of practice areas; and the disingenuous engineering of the law firm's financials to better position itself both publicly and internally.

Hildebrandt also expressed the need to clearly establish the roles of law firms' leaders to promote a sense of transparency throughout the partnership and prevent a "culture of secrecy" -- a problem, he said, that existed in many defunct law firms.

Hildebrandt is an adviser to Thomson Reuters.

 

Summary Judgments for January 9 

Summary Judgments for January 8 

Summary Judgments for January 7 

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook  


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters