Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Produce at a grocery store, file 2012. REUTERS Rebecca Cook

Wholesale grocers avoid trial in antitrust lawsuit

1/15/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Andrew Longstreth 

NEW YORK, Jan 15 (Reuters) - A federal judge has ruled that SuperValu Inc and C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc do not have to face a trial over allegations that they conspired to overcharge retail food businesses in the Midwest and New England.

U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery in Minneapolis ruled that the plaintiffs in the case, retail grocery operators D&G Inc and DeLuca's Market Corp, had not provided enough evidence for a jury to reasonably find that the defendants violated antitrust laws.

The case stemmed from a 2003 agreement between SuperValu and C&S to exchange assets. C&S transferred three distribution facilities in the Midwest to SuperValu which, in turn, transferred three distribution facilities in New England to C&S. The agreement also included provisions not to compete with each other for customers served by the operations that were part of the asset swap.

The plaintiffs claimed that the agreement was illegal and that it allowed SuperValu and C&S to overcharge retail customers in the Midwest and New England.

In her ruling on Friday, Montgomery found that the plaintiffs had not shown that the agreement between SuperValu and C&S hurt competition. In the Midwest, for instance, she wrote that the plaintiffs were not able to dispute evidence by the defendants that "customers seeking alternative sources for their products found several other wholesale grocery distributors willing and able to compete for their business."

Richard Drubel of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he did not think Montgomery's decision would withstand an appeal, which he said he would pursue.

"I think the defendants put one over on the court," Drubel said.

The case is In re Wholesale Grocery Products Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, No. 09-m-2090.

For plaintiffs: Richard Drubel of Boies, Schiller & Flexner.

For SuperValu: Stephen Safranski of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi.

For C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc: Charles Loughlin of Baker Botts.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters