Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

Legal

  •  
  •  

Man with briefcase REUTERS Yuriko Nakao

Breakingviews: Companies need more lawyers on board

2/26/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Reynolds Holding

NEW YORK, Feb 26 (Reuters Breakingviews) - U.S. companies could do with more lawyers. Not so much the bill-by-the-hour variety, though they help cover bosses' behinds. Rather, hiring attorneys as directors may cut risk, promote stability and boost value. Based on new research, investors should be glad that lawyers are turning up more often in U.S. boardrooms.

Attorneys haven't always embraced becoming directors. The American Bar Association warned in 1998 that advising a board while serving on it could create conflicts of interest. So it's no surprise that only about a quarter of large U.S. public firms had lawyers as directors in 2000.

But priorities shifted. Companies started seeking directors who could navigate increasingly complex litigation and regulation and hold executives accountable. By 2009, attorneys sat on almost half of public company boards.

It seems to have helped financially. By one measure, companies with lawyer-directors are almost 10 percent more valuable than other firms, according to a Cornell Law School and University of Arizona study. The study excluded financial firms, because high leverage and regulatory scrutiny can skew their performance.

The key could be lawyers' skill at cutting risk. Under their watch, chief executives get paid more for steady growth than taking chances, the research suggests. Meanwhile, litigation is less costly and patent protections are tighter. It all brings a lower cost of capital and higher value, the study concludes. On the downside, lawyer-directors tend to favor stiffer takeover defenses, but shareholders still come out ahead - at least on paper.

In the real world, there are exceptions. Lawyer Joel Hyatt, for instance, stumbled guiding fellow Hewlett-Packard board members through the 2010 resignation of Chief Executive Mark Hurd, whom he supported, and the hiring of Hurd's short-lived successor Leo Apotheker, whom Hyatt helped select. Chuck Prince, a long-time company lawyer, quit as Citigroup's CEO in late 2007 as the bank bumbled toward the 2008 financial crisis.

Even so, most boards that rubber-stamped risky behavior in recent years could have used the kind of reality check in which good attorneys specialize. With a knack for asking tough questions, legally trained directors can be investors' friends.

 

CONTEXT NEWS

- Lawyers who serve as directors increase the value of public companies by an average of 9.5 percent and by 10.2 percent on average when also serving as company executives, new research shows. Value was calculated according to Tobin's Q, essentially a firm's market value divided by the replacement cost of its assets.

- The study of U.S. public companies by professors Charles Whitehead of Cornell Law School and Lubomir Litov and Simone Sepe of the University of Arizona found that lawyer-directors reduce financial risk and boost a company's value by managing litigation, reining in executive pay and protecting patents and other intellectual property.

- The authors excluded financial firms from the research, concluding that the high leverage and regulatory scrutiny typical of the industry might obscure the connection between board behavior and financial performance.

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook   


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters