Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

A lamp featuring a Barclays logo in London. REUTERS Suzanne Plunkett_Small

Former Dewey partner sues Barclays over capital loan

2/19/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Casey Sullivan

NEW YORK, Feb 19 (Reuters) - A former Dewey & LeBoeuf partner sued by Barclays Bank in the United Kingdom for defaulting on a loan has responded with a lawsuit in New York federal court saying he did not take out the loan and that the loan agreement was fraudulent.

Londell McMillan, the former head of Dewey's entertainment, media and sports group, sued Barclays on Tuesday in U.S. District Court in New York in a dispute over a loan the bank allegedly made to finance McMillan's capital investment in Dewey before the law firm dissolved. In court papers, McMillan asked Judge Andrew Carter to rescind the Barclays loan agreement on grounds that it was a "fabrication."

McMillan said he joined LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & MacRae in 2007 before it merged with Dewey Ballantine. At the time, the firm's leaders required him to pay 36 percent of his compensation, or $540,000, toward a capital contribution that financed the firm's business operations, according to the lawsuit. McMillan claims in the suit that he did not sign up for a loan program to pay off the obligation.

Last December, Barclays sued McMillan in the United Kingdom's High Court of Justice seeking to recoup more than $540,000 for payment of a loan that McMillan allegedly took out on June 24, 2010, to finance his capital investment in Dewey.

McMillan claimed in court papers on Tuesday that he declined to enroll in the Barclays loan program. He said that he "has no recollection of signing any such (loan agreement)."

A Barclays spokesperson declined to comment.

McMillan said he would have no reason to sign up for the loan program on June 24 because two days earlier, Dewey's Chief Financial Officer Joel Sanders wrote him an email saying that his $540,000 of capital obligations had already been paid off, according to the lawsuit.

Prior to the June 22 email exchange, McMillan had already notified Dewey's leaders that he planned to leave the firm, according to the lawsuit. He said he had told the firm in March he wanted to wind down his practice with Dewey and that the firm owed him nearly $1 million in compensation dating back over the past three years.

FRAUD CLAIMS

In an email sent on June 22, Sanders responded with a tally of what the firm said it owed McMillan, according to the lawsuit. In the email, Sanders wrote the firm was reducing its debt to him by $540,000 to cover McMillan's capital contributions, McMillan said in court papers.

"Your capital has already been deducted and processed as it was way overdue and you never processed the loan documents," Sanders wrote McMillan, according to the lawsuit.

Since Dewey had told McMillan that his capital contribution was being deducted from compensation, there was no reason for him to sign the loan agreement, McMillan said.

Kevin Fritz, a lawyer for McMillan said that if the court for some reason finds the loan to be valid, McMillan would then argue that Barclays defrauded him when it did not disclose "material information" that Dewey was foundering when he took out the loan.

The fraud claims mirror allegations made against Citibank by a former Dewey & LeBoeuf partner pending in New York federal court and by two former Howrey partners in San Francisco superior court.

McMillan demanded a jury trial to prove his claims.

The case is L. Londell McMillan v. Barclays Bank PLC, U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, No. 13-CIV-1095.

For the plaintiff: Kevin Fritz and Jeffrey Schreiber of Meister Seelig & Fein

For Barclays: Not immediately available.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters