Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

Mark Chandler, file 2008. REUTERS Kevin Lamarque

Corporate counsel push antitrust response to 'patent trolls'

3/15/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By David Ingram

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawyers for major corporations told U.S. lawmakers they would welcome antitrust enforcement against so-called "patent trolls," raising pressure to act against them just as antitrust enforcers are weighing their options.

Derided by critics for causing a spike in patent litigation, the patent companies in question, known as trolls, specialize in buying up patents solely for the purpose of filing infringement suits or demanding licensing fees. Major corporations say they spend millions of dollars each year defending against the suits.

Supporters of the companies say they benefit small inventors and maximize the value of patents.

During a hearing on Thursday on what to do about the flood of patent suits, Representative Howard Coble, a North Carolina Republican, asked witnesses about the possibility of invoking antitrust law.

Coble is chairman of the U.S. House subcommittee on intellectual property.

Cisco Systems Inc General Counsel Mark Chandler responded that the patent companies, sometimes called patent aggregators, may threaten competition just as monopolies do.

"The patent aggregation efforts deserve very close antitrust scrutiny for that reason," Chandler told the subcommittee. "They have the impact across whole industries of forcing settlements (of patent suits) and suppressing competition in ways that are not intended as part of the patent grant."

The two U.S. antitrust enforcement authorities, the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission, are deliberating how to react.

In December the two agencies held a joint public workshop, and they are accepting written public feedback through April 5.

J.C. Penney Co Inc General Counsel Janet Dhillon, also testifying on Thursday, agreed with the call for more scrutiny. "We support that effort," she said.

Antitrust enforcers, though, would need to make a case that they had authority under competition laws, said C. Graham Gerst, a partner at Global IP Law Group who specializes in patent litigation and testified at the hearing.

"It's hard to conceive that these patent assertion entities have anything approaching market power," he said. The companies criticized as trolls are sometimes called patent assertion entities. But, Gerst added, "I'm not an antitrust lawyer."

(Additional reporting by Diane Bartz)

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook  


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters