Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

It's alive! Dexia's $775 mln MBS case vs JPMorgan back from the dead  read more »

Wal-Mart's whistle-blower problem: Public revelations trump privilege  read more »

The elephant in the (court)room: Amazon and the Apple e-books case  read more »

Marketing Popup

SEC set to bring civil charges against Miami in muni bond probe

7/24/2012 COMMENTS (0)

Two years ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought its first-ever enforcement action against a state, accusing New Jersey of deceiving municipal bond investors about the state's unfunded pension liabilities. The case was a wake-up call. Bloomberg predicted a wave of similar SEC suits against muni bond issuers, the National Association of Bond Lawyers convened a task force pension obligation disclosure, and the enforcement bar braced for action.

And then ... nothing. Well, not exactly nothing. In October 2010 the SEC's municipal securities unit announced a settlement with two officials from San Diego, in a case that dated back to the commission's 2008 settlement with the city for underreporting pension liability to bond investors. There were reports of SEC investigations of bonds issued by the city of Victorville, California, and of California's disclosure of obligations to its gigantic public employees' pension fund. The SEC also worked with the Justice Department on its municipal bond bid-rigging case against several major banks, and reached its own $51.2 million muni bond bid-rigging settlement with JPMorgan Chase in 2011. But the expected wave of enforcement actions didn't materialize. "Candidly, I expected to see a lot more," said Thomas Gorman of Dorsey and Whitney, who writes the SEC Actions blog. "These are complicated cases and they take a long time, but it's been a while."

Wait no more. On Monday, the SEC sent a Wells Notice to Ivan Harris of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, who represents the city of Miami. The letter confirmed that the SEC staff intends to recommend civil charges of securities fraud and other disclosure violations against the city. The letter does not specify that the allegations relate to bond issues, but city officials confirmed to The Miami Herald that the SEC has been investigating its disclosure of budget manipulation to muni bond investors.

According to the Herald, the SEC has been investigating Miami's muni bond practices for 30 months, and continues to investigate the financing of the Florida Marlins' baseball stadium. The SEC's letter to the city invited Miami to make a submission arguing why it should not be sued. Otherwise, the letter said, "the staff may seek a permanent injunction, a civil penalty and an order commanding the City of Miami to comply with the Commission's prior cease-and-desist order."

Miami's lawyer, Morgan Lewis partner Harris, said the city has not yet decided how it will respond to the Wells Notice. "The city respectfully disagrees with the SEC but looks forward to continuing the dialogue," Harris said, noting that Miami has cooperated with the agency since the investigation began.

William Daly, the director of governmental affairs for the National Association of Bond Lawyers, said the New Jersey case made it clear that both the SEC and investors are scrutinizing muni bond disclosures (though he said he hasn't heard about any par t icular regulatory investigations). "There's a recognition in the muni industry that (issuers and counsel) needed to look at things carefully," he said. "There's been a lot of thinking about what should go into disclosures." The latest guidelines came in May from the NABL task force, which advised broad disclosure of pension fund information.

An SEC spokesman didn't respond to an email request for comment on the agency's progress in enforcing adequate muni bond disclosure.

(Reporting by Alison Frankel)

Follow us on Twitter @AlisonFrankel@ReutersLegal  | Like us on Facebook


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters