Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

Legal

  •  
  •  

Oklahoma federal judge issues TRO barring enforcement of Shariah law ban

11/9/2010 COMMENTS (6)

Nov. 9 (Westlaw Journals) - A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting the state of Oklahoma from certifying a voter initiative making it unconstitutional to practice Muslim Shariah law.

Muneer Awad, a practicing Muslim, filed suit against the state and Paul Ziriax, the director of the Oklahoma State Board of Elections, seeking to prevent certification of State Question 755, which was approved by a wide margin of the state’s voters on Nov. 2.  Certification would put the law into immediate effect.   

State Question 755 amends Article 7, Section I of Oklahoma's constitution.  The initiative was described on the ballot to voters as a directive to state courts to “rely on federal and state law when deciding cases,” according to the suit.  The description states that the amendment would “forbid courts from considering or using international law.”  It would also “forbid courts from considering or using Shariah Law.” 

Awad argues that the law violates his freedom to practice his religion as Shariah law includes many commonplace rules, such as fair dealing, that are part of his faith.  In addition, he contends that the initiative has a sectarian purpose and the illicit effect of discrediting his faith. 

“The Shariah Ban, because the text only mentions and restricts the religious traditions upon which plaintiff draws his faith, will imply to Oklahomans that there is something especially nefarious about the Koran and the teaching of Mohammed that justifies its exclusion from state courts,” the complaint says. 

U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange held a hearing Monday in which she found that Awad has standing to bring suit and that he has made a preliminary showing that the new law would violate his rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.  She issued a temporary restraining order and set a hearing for Nov. 22 to decide whether to issue a preliminary injunction. 

The case is Awad v. Ziriax, No. 10-1186, W.D. Okla. (Filed Nov. 4, 2010).  Awad, executive director of the Council on American Islamic Relations-Oklahoma, is representing himself.  Scott Boughton of the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office represents the state. 

(Reporting by Jodine Mayberry, senior Web editor) 


Comments (6)

11/12/2010 3:19:36 PM by Anonymous

the United States Laws are based on Laws that are created by the people and not based solely on just one person's views that are held up as a way of compliance on people who believe in Islam. sharia law is based on Mohammad's views and his actions as a drunk. sharia law is based on stone age views that are still held today by those who see themselves as the religious class who are better than the uneducated general population. sharia law is unable to withstand scrutiny in the light of day, if the sharia laws are able to be enforced in OK. then all women in that state have just lost the right to be considered equal, and are property of the husband or their father.

11/9/2010 4:27:09 PM by Anonymous

Bravery has nothing to do with it. There's just way too many people in this country that have confused tolerance with acceptance. I think it's cowardly to bow down to someone else's demands just because it could be misconstrued as "intolerant". If you want laws that condone things like marital rape and cultivate a society of mindless religious zealouts then by all means get the f**k outta this country and go live in the butthole of the world. That isn't what this country needs. Protecting sharia law under the US constitution makes about as much sense and protecting nazism.

11/9/2010 4:00:07 PM by Anonymous

A law that singles out one religion's laws is not constitutional, in this country. The US is NOT Germany or France. We have a constitution with a bill of rights, and the first article states clearly 'Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion'. If the amendment were to ban International AND religious laws (like the ten commandments!) without singling out one particular faith, in my opinion it might be constitutional. Awad has a point, and Judge Miles-LaGrange is a brave jurist to rule as she did.

11/9/2010 3:52:52 PM by Anonymous

Sharia law has no place in this country, or this world for that matter. Take your tired, BS, archaic, xenophobic, mysoginistic, barbaric teachings and shove them up your a$$.

11/9/2010 3:33:34 PM by Anonymous

Prove it !! Since you offer no proof in your laypersons opinion

11/9/2010 3:25:32 PM by Anonymous

Too many Western nations are allowing Sharia Law into their court systems. If this is allowed in Oklahoma, it will set a precedent for the entire country. Although Mr. Awad has the right to practice his religion as he sees fit, the laws of his religion should be exercised by his religious leaders and should never supercede the laws of the land.


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters