On Wednesday morning, Tweetdeck blinked with a missive from CNBC sports business reporter Darren Rovell, live from jury duty at a
court in New Jersey. "Thinking of saying that if they pick me on
a jury, I would do a Twitter poll to determine the verdict."
We assume Rovell was kidding (and the rest of the day
brought no such poll), but two recent law review articles -- on
jurors' digital research and social media posts during trials --
reinforce what we've discussed before: judges and lawyers are
worried about how jurors' use of social media affects what
happens in court. Both papers indicate that jurors are generally
resisting the temptation to tweet out of school -- and one
study's author, District Judge Amy St. Eve of federal court in
Chicago, said the best way to continue to prevent inappropriate
juror behavior is as simple as telling jury members what they
can and cannot do.
"Google, Gadgets, and Guilt: Juror Misconduct in the Digital Age" by Thaddeus Hoffmeister, in the University of Colorado Law
Review, and "Ensuring an Impartial Jury in the Age of Social Media" by St. Eve and her law clerk, Michael Zuckerman, in the
Duke Law and Technology Review, highlight many examples of
trials that have been disrupted and verdicts that have been
thrown out. So there's no doubt that some jurors are
communicating in ways they shouldn't be. But when the study
authors conducted surveys to get an idea of the extent of the
problem, they found little evidence of widespread concern.
Fifty federal judges, prosecutors and public defenders
responded to Hoffmeister's questionnaire, which focused on
jurors improperly using the Internet to conduct outside research
about cases they're hearing. Approximately 10 percent of the
respondents "reported personal knowledge of a juror conducting
Internet research," Hoffmeister, an associate professor at the
University of Dayton School of Law, wrote.
St. Eve's paper included an informal survey of 140 jurors
who served in either her courtroom or that of her colleague,
District Judge Matthew Kennelly. St. Eve asked jurors whether
they'd discussed cases via social media. Only six respondents
reported "any temptation to communicate about the case through
social media," the paper said, and none of them admitted to
actually doing it.
Both papers note that their survey responses could
drastically under-represent the actual behavior of
jurors. Judges and lawyers don't know everything jurors are
doing, and, even in an anonymous survey, jurors might not want
to share all with the judge who just presided over their case.
Still, St. Eve said she wasn't surprised by how few jurors
reported a temptation to talk about their trials via social
media. "My experience is juries want to do the right thing, and
they try very hard to do the right thing," she told On the Case.
To assist them in that effort, St. Eve instructs her juries that
using Facebook or Twitter to talk about their jury service is
prohibited. She also said judges ought to explain clearly to the
jury that social media can corrupt the trial process, noting,
for instance, that if one of a juror's contacts responds to a
post with incorrect or out-of-context information, that's not
fair to the parties. Hoffmeister also makes the point that
judges should explain clearly to jurors not only that they're
not supposed to search the Web, but why they shouldn't. (Judges
are increasingly likely to address social media in jury
instructions. As St. Eve's paper points out, a recent survey of the judiciary indicated only 6 percent responding judges hadn't
ever talked to their jurors about social media use.
Clearly, the Internet and social media are going to continue
to be a presence in courtrooms, and if there's a takeaway from
these two papers, it's that judges have to anticipate calamity,
however remote that possibility may be. My colleague Carlyn
Kolker illustrated that truth on Thursday, pointing out that
California's upcoming celebration of Juror Appreciation Week
includes a "Focus on the Courtroom" initiative to remind jurors
that inappropriate use of social media is prohibited during
trial.
(Reporting by Erin Geiger Smith)
Follow us on Twitter: @erin_gs, @AlisonFrankel, @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook