Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

Gavel, NY State Supreme Court, 60 Centre St. REUTERS Chip East

State appeals court rejects lawyer's discrimination suit against Skadden

5/16/2012 COMMENTS (0)

NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) - A lawyer's wrongful termination lawsuit against Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom was properly dismissed last year by a New York judge, an appeals court ruled Tuesday.

Rita Gordon, who was fired from the law firm in 2006, claimed Skadden had terminated her because of her age and gender in order to replace her with a younger, male lawyer.

But the law firm said she improperly billed to clients tens of thousands of dollars in car service charges for her own personal use, including rides between her home and the office.

In her original complaint, filed six years ago, Gordon argued that the car rides were a legitimate business expense because she often took work home with her and could not carry a heavy suitcase filled with documents up and down subway stairs due to a chronic back injury. The firm's allegations were simply an excuse to fire her, she argued.

But the Appellate Division, First Department, found that State Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling in Manhattan did not abuse his discretion in finding that the firm had offered legitimate reasons for her termination when he dismissed the lawsuit.

"The motion court properly determined that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of showing that she was discharged under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination," a unanimous five-judge appeals court panel wrote in an unsigned opinion.

Gordon declined to comment Wednesday, referring questions to her lawyer, John Balestriere, who said a decision on whether to appeal had not yet been made.

"As Ms. Gordon has maintained consistently throughout the years of this litigation, the firm wrongfully terminated her because the firm's senior partners did not think she fit in," he said in an email. "Ms. Gordon never hid that she used the car service for years, without complaint by anyone until right before she was terminated."

A lawyer for Skadden did not return a request for comment.

The case is Gordon v. Kadet et al., Appellate Division, First Department, No. 7637A.

For Gordon: John Balestriere of Balestriere Fariello

For Skadden: Bettina Plevan of Proskauer Rose

(Reporting by Joseph Ax)

Follow us on Twitter: @ReutersLegal  |  Like us on Facebook


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters