Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

A man holds a briefcase at a New York job fair. REUTERS Shannon Stapleton

NY State Bar Association rejects non-lawyer ownership

11/19/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By Casey Sullivan

Nov 19 (Reuters) - The New York State Bar Association House of Delegates has voted to reaffirm the group's position that non-lawyers should be barred from having an ownership stake in a law firm.

The decision comes after a nine-month inquiry by a state bar association task force, which concluded that a lawyer's judgment could be influenced by the non-lawyer investors.

To reach its conclusion, the task force interviewed lawyers and researched possible benefits of non-lawyer ownership such as allowing law firms to partner with companies that provide consulting advice on e-discovery and document review.

The task force found that the risks inherent in outside owners outweighed any financial benefit, said Stephen Younger, chair of the New York State Bar Association Task Force on Non-Lawyer Ownership and a former president of the bar association.

The vote by the House of Delegates, which took place on Saturday, is the latest defeat for proponents of non-lawyer ownership in law firms. New York, like the 49 other states, prohibits non-lawyers from holding a stake in law firms, though Washington has allowed the practice under certain limited for more than 20 years.

New York Bar leaders took up the idea of non-lawyer ownership in February after England and Australia adopted rules allowing non-lawyers to invest in law firms as a way of raising additional capital.

The American Bar Association decided in April that non-lawyers could not own a stake in law firms after conducting its own inquiry into the matter.

The personal injury law firm Jacoby & Meyers last year filed federal lawsuits in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, arguing that those states' rules against non-lawyer ownership in law firms hindered its ability to raise funds from outside investors.

The cases in New Jersey and Connecticut are pending. A federal j udge threw out the New York case, but a judge on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals indicated in October that the firm could get a second shot at bringing the lawsuit.

As part of its vote, the House of Delegates also adopted a proposition that would allow New York attorneys to share fees with out-of-state lawyers at firms with non-lawyer owners. The delegates accepted the conclusion of the task force, which said such arrangements would be less likely to unduly influence New York lawyers.

The proposal will now be passed on to the New York State Bar Association Committee on Standards of Attorney Conduct for further revisions. After that, the proposal will go back to the House of Delegates for a vote to finalize the rule.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters