Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

Traffic signal flashes green in New York. REUTERS Lucas Jackson

NY judge's claims against conduct commission rejected by appeals court

11/13/2012 COMMENTS (0)

By Daniel Wiessner

Nov 13 (Reuters) - A town justice has lost his bid to bar the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct from continuing an investigation against him for allegedly charging excessive fines in traffic cases.

Andrew Piraino argued that the commission, which acknowledged the excessive fines were levied unintentionally, lacked jurisdiction because it had failed to allege facts amounting to actual misconduct. Piraino, who is an attorney and the town justice in the Syracuse suburb of Salina, filed an Article 78 petition, seeking to prohibit the commission from continuing its investigation.

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, on Friday dismissed Piraino's claims, allowing the commission to resume its case against him.

"Prohibition is available only when a court or quasi-judicial body exceeds its jurisdiction in a manner that implicates the legality of the proceeding itself, which is not the case here," the court wrote.

The panel included Justices Erin Peradotto, Edward Carni, Stephen Lindley and Salvatore Martoche.

Piraino's attorney and law partner, Aaron Zimmerman, did not return a request for comment.

Robert Tembeckjian, the commission's chief administrator and counsel, said on Tuesday that he "appreciated" the ruling.

The Fourth Department, he said, "has affirmed ... that under New York law, an Article 78 is not the proper forum in which to adjudicate charges of judicial misconduct."

The commission in 2009 notified Piraino that it was investigating him for allegedly charging more than $20,000 in excessive fees in nearly 1,000 traffic cases between 2006 and 2008.

Last year, Acting Supreme Court Justice John Cherundolo in Onondaga County dismissed Piraino's claims, but five months later reversed himself and ordered discovery after granting reargument. Cherundolo also sealed the case once it was reinstated.

The commission may recommend admonishment, censure, suspension or removal. Judges reserve the right to automatically appeal the commission's decisions to the Court of Appeals.

Piraino was admitted to the bar in 1983 and was elected justice in Salina in 1994. His current term expires on Dec. 31, 2013.

The case is the Matter of John Doe v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, No. 11-02281.

For Piraino: Aaron Zimmerman.

For the CJC: Kathleen Treasure of the Attorney General's office.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters