Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

Citibank, New York. REUTERS Lucas Jackson

Howrey partners lob new fraud claims against Citibank in lawsuit

1/8/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Casey Sullivan 

Jan 8(Reuters) - Two former partners of the defunct Howrey law firm have accused Citibank of committing fraud in connection with a loan program that financed partners' capital investments in the firm, court documents show.

Former Howrey partners Stephen O'Neal and David Buoncristiani said in court filings that Citibank hid Howrey's financial woes while encouraging the partners to enroll in a loan program financing their capital in the flailing firm.

In a string of depositions, emails and financial documents filed in November in San Francisco Superior Court, O'Neal and Buoncristiani claimed that Citibank executives convinced them to sign up for the loan program, despite knowledge that Howrey's financial situation was strained.

"I later found out that during this whole period of time ... when I was being romanced by Citibank, that they had reason to believe -- in fact, they knew -- that Howrey was in default of material covenants, and they didn't tell me that," said O'Neal in a deposition.

A Citibank spokeswoman declined to comment and the bank's lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.

O'Neal and Buoncristiani's claims mirror allegations made against Citibank by a former Dewey & LeBoeuf partner in a lawsuit pending in federal court in New York. In that case, the bank is suing a Dewey partner for repayment of a capital loan and the partner has alleged Citibank committed fraud by not informing him of the failed law firm's financial problems.

If the former Howrey and Dewey partners are successful in their claims, other former partners in failed firms could be empowered to challenge loan agreements, said David Eisen, a Los Angeles lawyer who specializes in representing lawyers in financial disputes.

"There is no question that (a victory) would embolden other partners similarly situated across the country to make the same claim," said Eisen. "When lawyers hear about a legal theory that succeeds, they can't wait to try it out for themselves."

RECALLING THE LOAN

O'Neal and Buoncristiani's lawsuit has proceeded quietly since it was filed in September 2011, shortly after the men left Howrey for the law firm Jones Day. At the time, Citibank sought to compel O'Neal and Buoncristiani to repay capital loans totalling $735,000.

O'Neal and Buoncristiani sued, asking the court to void the loans. They argued that they did not owe payment because Citibank had not informed them of Howrey's financial problems. Instead, the partners said, Citibank presented the firm as financially strong.

The two former partners claimed that Citibank knew that Howrey was in financial distress because the firm repeatedly had breached a lending agreement on a $75 million line of credit, according to the lawsuit. In three instances -- in 2007, 2008 and 2009 -- Howrey was unable to meet the terms of the loan, O'Neal and Buoncristiani said in the filings.

In 2009, Citibank had to modify the loan to qualify Howrey for additional borrowing, the documents said. The firm drew "an incredible $23 million over its borrowing limit," which gave Citibank the right to recall the loan altogether, according to the former partners' lawsuit.

O'Neal and Buoncristiani, who joined Howrey in late 2008, claimed the 2009 breach, which happened in April of that year, ca me shortly before they signed their loans with Citibank to finance their capital contribution to the firm.

They said they signed up for the loans after Citibank Vice President Cassie Khuu told them that the bank had a great relationship with Howrey and that the firm was financially solid, according to the pair's lawsuit.

"What she didn't tell me was that that wasn't true," said O'Neal in a deposition. "Bankers usually look very dimly on borrowers who breach material covenants in their financing agreements, and law firms get put out of business by banks for breaching those covenants."

Khuu declined comment through a Citibank representative.

CITIBANK CLAIM

Citibank claimed in court papers that it did not know of the April breach while encouraging the partners to enroll in the loan program. The bank said it only learned of the breach in May, after the partners had already signed up for the loans.

Citibank also claimed that it owed no duty to the Howrey partners to inform them of the firm's financial condition and that any damages the partners suffered from joining Howrey and signing up for the loan program was a result of their own negligence.

Howrey collapsed in early 2011 after a failed merger attempt and a mass partner exodus. Allan Diamond, Howrey's bankruptcy trustee, declined to comment.

O'Neal and Buoncristiani did not respond to requests for comment. Keith Johnson, who is representing O'Neal and Buoncristiani, did not respond to a request for comment.

It is not uncommon for former partners of bankrupt law firms to fight with their banks about repayment of their capital loans, said Jerome Kowalski, a law firm consultant. It's rare, however, for such disputes to rise to the level of a public lawsuit, he said, but instead the parties usually work out a payment plan.

In May 2012, Citibank sued former Dewey & LeBoeuf partner Steven Otillar for defaulting on a $207,000 capital loan after he left Dewey for the Houston firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.

Otillar has said in court filings that Citibank hid Dewey's precarious financial status from partners so that they would sign up for the loans and the bank could shift a pre-existing debt owed by Dewey to individual credit-worthy partners.

Otillar has requested a jury trial instead of summary judgment, and the case is pending before a federal judge in the Southern District of New York.

Otillar did not respond to a request for comment and his lawyer declined to comment.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters