Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

Judges chair, NY State Supreme Court, 60 Centre. REUTERS Chip East

Rule would clarify N.Y. judges' role in pro se cases

1/25/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Daniel Wiessner

NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - The New York State Office of Court Administration has proposed a rule that would authorize judges to make reasonable efforts to facilitate the ability of unrepresented litigants to have their matters fairly heard.

Section 100.3 of the state Code of Judicial Conduct currently lists 11 ethical requirements that judges must meet, including remaining neutral and refraining from making public comments about pending proceedings. The rule does not include any provisions related to pro se litigants.

The proposal, which was released on Thursday, would amend section 100.3 to read, "it is not a violation of this rule for a judge to make reasonable efforts to facilitate the ability of unrepresented litigants to have their matters fairly heard."

OCA is accepting public comments on the proposal through March 25.

The proposal was first recommended in May by Helaine Barnett, the chair of a state task force on access to civil legal services, in a letter to Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman.

During a series of public hearings held last year, a number of judges expressed confusion over what steps they could take to aid unrepresented litigants without compromising their neutrality, Barnett wrote in the May 31 letter.

"We suggest the issuance of guidelines, including specific examples, that will help judges better understand the appropriate boundaries," wrote Barnett, the former president of the Legal Services Corporation.

In a 1990 opinion, the state Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics said that judges may not give legal advice to pro se litigants and should advise them to speak to an attorney. The committee's opinions are not binding but may form the basis of disciplinary action against judges.

In her letter, Barnett said the proposed rule would bring New York in line with 25 states and the District of Columbia, which have adopted similar measures. Most are modeled on an American Bar Association rule that permits judges to make "reasonable accommodations" for pro se litigants.

South Dakota in 2006 became the first state to adopt a rule explicitly recognizing that judges may make reasonable accommodations for pro se litigants, according to the ABA.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook 


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters