Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

Computer keyboard, file 2012. REUTERS Kacper Pempel

Judge denies accused cyber hacker's recusal motion

2/21/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Bernard Vaughan 

NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - The judge overseeing the criminal case against accused computer hacker Jeremy Hammond has denied his lawyers' motion to have her recused from the case.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska issued her ruling just hours after holding a hearing on the issue Thursday.

Prosecutors have accused Hammond of hacking into the computers of security research company Strategic Forecasting Inc, or "Stratfor." Hammond had demanded that Preska turn over the case to another judge after the name of her husband, Cahill Gordon & Reindel partner Thomas Kavaler, appeared on a list of possible victims of the alleged cyber attack.

The government says Hammond is affiliated with the hacking group Anonymous, which had also issued a statement calling for a new judge to be put on the case.

In her denial, Preska wrote that the motion filed by Hammond's attorneys, led by Elizabeth Fink, was "replete with conclusory, hearsay allegations pertaining to Mr. Kavaler's status as a victim of the Stratfor Hack and as a party with financial interests in this matter."

The hack did not injure her husband and, further, Kavaler provided a sworn statement that Stratfor had never been a client of his or his firm's, Preska wrote.

Kavaler also had not knowingly been a Stratfor customer and never provided Stratfor with his credit card number or other personal information, Preska wrote, citing her husband's statement.

Hammond's attorneys had also argued that Kavaler could have a financial interest in the matter because clients of Cahill Gordon's were also victims of the alleged Stratfor attack. But they failed to show that those clients, including Merrill Lynch & Co and American International Group Inc, were victimized beyond the disclosure of email addresses, Preska wrote.

"Defendant's attempt to draw such a link is futile," Preska wrote.

At the hearing earlier Thursday, Preska had appeared skeptical of the arguments of Hammond's attorneys.

"You haven't closed the circle," Preska said at the hearing, of the connection between Cahill Gordon and its clients who were allegedly hacked. "What's the connection to this case?"

Thomas Brown, an assistant U.S. Attorney in Manhattan, said at the hearing that the defense was engaging in "rank speculation" by arguing Kavaler could have a personal connection with clients affected by the Stratfor attack even if his firm isn't representing them over the matter.

"The defense is grasping at straws at this point," he said.

Fink and Sarah Kunstler, another attorney for Hammond, were not immediately available for comment on the ruling.

Hammond has pleaded not guilty to charges including computer hacking and conspiracy and faces up to 42 years in prison if convicted.

The next court date in the case is April 10.

The case is USA v. Ackroyd, U.S. District Court in Manhattan, No. 12-00185.

For Hammond: Elizabeth Fink and Sarah Kunstler.

For the government: Rosemary Nidiry and Thomas Brown, U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook  


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters