Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Featured Content from WESTLAW
Beginning in June, Thomson Reuters News & Insight content will be available exclusively on WestlawNext®, as part of its Practitioner Insights offering. On June 21, the Thomson Reuters News & Insight website, iPhone® app and newsletters will be discontinued. See Frequently Asked Questions to learn more.

New York Legal

  •  
  •  

A bulldozer spreads processed coal. REUTERS Jason Cohn

Pryor Cashman wins $2.5 mln award against coal company

2/8/2013 COMMENTS (0)

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK, Feb 8 (Reuters) - U.S. Coal Corporation must pay Pryor Cashman nearly $2.5 million in legal fees, a New York state judge has ruled, rejecting claims of overbilling and conflicts of interest from the mining company.

Acting Supreme Court Justice Melvin Schweitzer granted Pryor Cashman's motion for fees stemming from work the firm performed from 2006 to 2011 for the coal company as it sought to acquire other companies and considered a public offering.

Pryor Cashman sued U.S Coal Corporation in 2011, after it said it had given U.S. Coal numerous chances to pay the balance of millions of dollars in legal fees it had billed, and moved for summary judgment last June.

Lawyers for U.S. Coal did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday.

In a cross-motion for summary judgment, U.S. Coal claimed that the firm had overbilled the company. It also alleged that the firm failed to disclose several potential conflicts of interest, including that its lead lawyer on the case, Eric Hellige, held both shares and notes issued by the company.

Since Pryor Cashman was advising U.S. Coal on transactions that affected shareholders and creditors, the company claimed, the firm should have told it about Hellige's financial holdings and was therefore not entitled to collect legal fees.

Schweitzer rejected those arguments, noting that U.S. Coal never contested the invoices and in fact paid some of them without complaint.

"The record ... establishes that U.S. Coal did not make a timely objection to the invoices, which is critical to the validity of the claim," he wrote.

Schweitzer also dismissed the conflict of interest argument, saying that U.S. Coal had not shown that it was damaged in any way by the potential conflicts.

The firm argued in court papers that Hellige owned stock and notes as any other individual investor and that "simply owning stock does not give rise to a conflict of interest."

Gideon Cashman, the firm's chairman, said in an interview that the alleged conflicts caused no harm to U.S. Coal.

"Their reciprocal motion for summary judgment was denied completely," he said. "We're quite pleased with the result."

The case is Pryor Cashman v. U.S. Coal Corporation, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, No. 651908/2011.

For Pryor Cashman: Gideon Cashman, Eric Fishman and Ross Bagley of Pryor Cashman.

For U.S. Coal: Christopher Mason and Melisa Gerecci of Nixon Peabody.

Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook


Register or log in to comment.

© 2013 Thomson Reuters