By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Republicans on a U.S. House
financial panel on Tuesday said Wall Street and housing
regulators need to learn to do more with less, as Washington
tries to tame deficits by cutting back on spending.
The House Financial Services Committee voted to release a
19-page policy document that does not call for specific levels
of cuts but singles out agencies, including the Securities and
Exchange Commission, for not using resources wisely.
The document was critical of the SEC's track record, from
its failure to quickly catch frauds to past gaffes that led to
wasteful spending, including $1 million on unnecessary computer
equipment.
It also noted that the SEC's budget nearly tripled over the
past decade.
"Because the resources of the American people are not
infinite, government officials must allocate those scarce
resources wisely to fewer programs," said the document, which
was drafted by the Republican majority. "The decision to cut
spending is not an easy one. But it is necessary."
Customarily, U.S. House panels do not put forth their views
and estimates for the upcoming budget year until after the
president submits his recommendations. The views are not
binding; however, they carry great weight with congressional
appropriators in deciding annual spending levels.
This year, President Barack Obama delayed releasing his
budget because Congress is confronting two critical deadlines
that could lead to drastic budget cuts, and possibly a partial
government shutdown.
The first deadline, March 1, will trigger automatic
across-the-board spending cuts of $85 billion known as
"sequestration" unless Congress agrees to an alternative.
According to White House Office of Management and Budget
estimates, the SEC's $1.32 billion annual budget could face a
$108 million cut if sequestration happens.
The second crucial deadline is March 27 when the temporary
spending measure to keep the government running expires. A
failure by Congress to reach an accord could lead to a partial
government shutdown.
Despite the lack of a presidential budget for fiscal 2014,
the Republican-controlled House decided this week to press ahead
with the normal course of budget season business, saying they
are required to do so by law.
Democrats oppose the move, saying it is premature both
without hard numbers from the president and also as the deadline
for sequestration looms.
SEC BUDGET AT CENTER OF DEBATE
Although the House Financial Services has jurisdiction over
a wide range of agencies and programs, the SEC was in the line
of fire at Tuesday's meeting.
Republicans blamed the SEC for missing the Bernard Madoff
and Allen Stanford Ponzi schemes, and also for exacerbating the
financial crisis by not intervening to change mark-to-market
accounting rules, which critics say crippled banks holding
subprime mortgage debt.
They also pointed to SEC rules they disagree with, including
one provision from the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law
that would require companies to disclose if their products
contain "conflict minerals" from the Democratic Republic of the
Congo.
"I think it's kind of interesting when you look at Stanford
and Madoff, it wasn't a question that they needed more money -
we just needed regulators that were actually doing their job,"
said Republican Texas Congressman Randy Neugebauer.
"Obviously they ignored many of the warning signs."
Democrats countered that the SEC desperately needs more
money to do its job, especially as it works to finish rolling
out all of the new Dodd-Frank rules. They said that Congress
should focus on averting the cuts from sequestration.
"What do we get with an SEC that faces sequester? We get the
two things that the private sector hates most: Uncertainty and
delay," said California Democrat Brad Sherman.
While Republicans were critical of the SEC on Tuesday, their
policy document also indicates they could potentially be open to
funding boosts in target areas.
The document calls for hiring more economists and trading
specialists, noting it will help with things such as conducting
economic analysis on its rules. It also supports the SEC's
efforts to expand its information technology systems.
Follow us on Twitter @ReutersLegal | Like us on Facebook